001
101
3000 #wong of SAJ -; siv perion #nioj mnisaize e/J
od Dura,assio ven So vialfood #gaihllud ID to NONSUSIRG LU? end of AM to notezegong fe ni habiyla bbro/a alife duld mitu e-commsyah Litrofon all or A bow
Love at excom to 00.05 want buvo að Ita ou climbiigga Sá
eo i da o prchase a mirabice orta dura rica en 150 ceantact
Te doista idea a Noir ou prusje 10 cm
3220%
.43aixe
C 5Dov Volbi adow nucoÏToo4000 to suploa
I
t
VOLOD CIG Qaug
Juif evtanoris non fcd::Iosries $1 off ou 100 dareizur
to peb omas JoIon 1 evi, of h
ARCA RA
:
tofow anto
I
tekjar so dass Dandos na danto vento,mi (twat do da
nnow doo Delvin e hĹo 'W «ndaleg Ginein, LOTI DAJI
To boito G #.'biza um. pridjwa ke ghelor Aravon ovd
t
I
omoravcevol Lal:Ioc od us
-
beanno Romne£ to sing ora na dikong to atnet MACTO
misd nbrAÍ
20 BMC *O*
the scheme.
Consequently under the joint scheme, and in future in all cases if the general recommendation of the Conference is adopted, the War Department should make up to the Colony 2/3rds of the value of the land thus lost to it, the Colony contributing the 1/3rd as its portion of the cost. Steps should accordingly be taken to revise those cases referred to above in which the capitalized value of the Crown rents on lands required for the joint scheme has been credited to the Colony in the account of Colonial Military Lands. These credits should be cancelled, and the War Department should make over to the Colony 2/3rds of the capitalised value. In the case of land over which clearance rights exist, the value of the land for purposes of division between the two Governments should be the value as subject to the Clearance Rights already held by the War Department.
3. Some doubts have been raised as to the tenure on which the War Department should hold these lands, the value of which would have been divided between the two Governments. The question would not arise until the War Department had no further use for the land and wished to dispose of it. In such case the Colonial Government should have the right to resume the land on payment (1) of the actual sum originally contributed by the War Department towards the price of the land, and (2) of two-thirds of the agreed value at the time of resumption of the buildings.
001
101
3000 #wong of SAJ -; siv perion #nioj mnisaize e/J
od Dura,assio ven So vialfood #gaihllud ID to NONSUSIRG LU? end of AM to notezegong fe ni habiyla bbro/a alife duld mitu e-commsyah Litrofon all or A bow
Love at excom to 00.05 want buvo að Ita ou climbiigga Sá
eo i da o prchase a mirabice orta dura rica en 150 ceantact
Te doista idea a Noir ou prusje 10 cm
3220%
.43aixe
C 5Dov Volbi adow nucoÏToo4000 to suploa
I
t
VOLOD CIG Qaug
Juif evtanoris non fcd::Iosries $1 off ou 100 dareizur
to peb omas JoIon 1 evi, of h
ARCA RA
:
tofow anto
I
tekjar so dass Dandos na danto vento,mi (twat do da
nnow doo Delvin e hĹo 'W «ndaleg Ginein, LOTI DAJI
To boito G #.'biza um. pridjwa ke ghelor Aravon ovd
t
I
omoravcevol Lal:Ioc od us
-
beanno Romne£ to sing ora na dikong to atnet MACTO
misd nbrAÍ
20 BMC *O*
the scheme.
Consequently under the joint soheme, and in future in all cases if the general recommendation of the Conferenes is adopted, the War Department should make up to the Colony 2/3rds of the value of the land thus lost to it, the Colony contributing the 1/3rd as its portion of the cost. Steps should accordingly be taken to revise those cases referred to above in which the capitalized value of the Crow rents on lands required for the joint scheme has been credited to the Colony in the account of Colonial Military Lands. These credits should be can- oslled, and the War Department should make over to the Colony 2/3rds of the capitalised value. In the case of land over which clearance rights exist, the value of the land for purposes of division between the two Government s should be the value as subject to the Clearance Rights already held by the War Departmant.
3. Some doubts have been raised as to the tenure on which the War Department should hold these lands, the value of which would have been divided between the two
Governments. The question would not arise until the War
Department had no further use for the land and wished to
dispose of it, In such case the Colonial Government should have the right to resume the land on payment (1)
of the actual sum originally contributed by the War Department towards the price of the land, and (2) of two- thirds of the agreed value at the time of resumption of the buildings.
In
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.